After reading strategies, I noticed I didn't read critically and analyze well. I think I read by almost intuitive. However, there are some strategies that I have already used, such as underlining, anotating, considering situation, and thinking about patterns. But I noticed I considered writer's purpose but I didn't consider "Who is the intended audience?" "What is gerne?" "What is the medium, How does it affect you the way you read?" My considering wasn't enough. Also when I read about "identifying patterns", I noticed my identifying wasn't enough. In my reading, when I found some words were repeated or found synonyms,I marked them. But in example on the textbook, the words are clasyfied to several groups,not only synonym or same words:such as group "life,death, and rebirth"= birth, reborn, "words that directly addresses the reader"= Consider~, Do not listen~. Therefore, I have to change my reading process more critically
A strategy that I was really interested in when I read those strategies is "Reflecting, Rereading, Persisting" I guess some people might think these are nothing new for our reading but I found especially peristance is very important for me. As I wrote in before reading, I sometimes give up after rereading several times if I still can't understand. This textbook says successful students see difficult texts as challenges" I'm going to keep working on this texts until I make sence of it" This is so different from my atittude for difficult reading.
From strategies on textbook, I noticed I didn't read critically and I have to be persistent for difficult texts. Strategies that I used are very shallow, not deep or profoud. Therefore, I have to study these strategies in detail.
No comments:
Post a Comment